Monthly Archives: August 2024

Tractor-Trailer Hits Disabled Car Parked at Side of Road

Did Emergency Doctrine Excuse Driver From Liability for Injuries?

Alwin Martinez was injured in an incident when his vehicle became disabled on the highway and Yesenia Camacho drove to the scene to help him. Camacho testified that although she first parked behind Martinez on the shoulder, she eventually moved her vehicle so that it extended partially into the right-hand lane of the highway so that she could help jump start Martinez’s vehicle. While they were waiting for the vehicle to charge, a tractor-trailer leased by J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. crashed into the back of Camacho’s vehicle, injuring both Martinez and Camacho. Litigation ensued..

Martinez and Camacho’s motion for summary judgment against Transport as to liability was granted. And Transport’s affirmative defense of comparative negligence was dismissed. Transport appealed.   

Continue reading

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do- When A Residential Lease is Involved

Court Adjudicates Claim of Tenant and Counterclaim of Landlord

Emily Pickens filed a small claims action in  Civil Court against Terry Lane seeking return of a security deposit in the amount of $2,825 on a market-rate, residential apartment that she leased after vacating the premises about a year before the expiration of her two-year lease.

Lane asserted a counterclaim against Pickens for the rent due between the time when she vacated the apartment and when he was able to re-rent the apartment, plus the expenses incurred to re-rent the apartment.

Continue reading

Purchaser of Great Neck Unit Fails to Close on Two TOE Dates

Court Adjudicates Seller’s Claim for Liquidated Damages

P.W. Developers commenced a declaratory judgment action  against R.C. arising out of a purchase agreement and a rider  pursuant to which the R.C. agreed to purchase from P.W.D. residential unit 000 and garage unit 0 located at 88 Cuttermill Road, in Great, Neck New York for a total purchase price of $545,000.00, with a down payment of $54,500.00 deposited with the parties’ escrow agent, leaving a balance of $490.500 due to be paid at the closing.  P.W.D moved for summary judgment granting the relief sought in the complaint.

The purchase agreement provided that in the event of R.C.’s default for failing to close P.W.D shall “retain the Downpayment [sic] as liquidated damages”. And the rider to the purchase agreement also provided that if R.C. defaulted under the purchase agreement, the “[PWD]shall retain the Downpayment [sic] as liquidated damages”.

Continue reading

Was Manhattanville College Liable or Did Player Assume Risk?

Richard G. Mazze, a member of the varsity soccer team at Manhattanville College, allegedly sustained an injury to his back as he was performing a squat exercise during a weight training session. Mazze sued Manhattanville College, Manhattanville College Athletic Department and Manhattanville College Men’s Varsity Soccer.      

Manhatanville moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the gound that the action was barred by the doctrine of assumption of risk. Supreme Court denied the motion. And Manhattanville appealed.

Continue reading

Insured’s Home Was Damaged By Fire

Were Broker/Carrier Liable for Underinsurance?

Kim Clark’s home was damaged by a fire.  Clark failed to advise her insurance agent or broker about an addition to her home which increased its square footage by approximately fifty percent. As a result of the fire, Clark claimed losses to her home and personal property far exceeded her insurance coverage limits which did not account for the unknown increased square footage of the renovated home.

Clark filed suit seeking damages against Urbanski Insurance Agency, Inc.  alleging it negligently procured insufficient insurance coverage for the home and against Preferred Mutual Insurance Company claiming it was vicariously liable for Urbanski’s alleged negligence.

Continue reading

Cinder Block Boundary Wall Did Not Comport With Deeds For Contiguous Properties

Court Decides If Doctrine Of Practical Location Was Dispositive of Neighbors’ Border Dispute

Robert Czenszak and others commenced an action to quiet title and for declaratory relief against Anthony Iasello and Catherine Iasello. Czenszak aleged that a cinder block wall forms the boundary line between the parties’ adjoining properties under the doctrine of practical location and that a strip of land that lies between the cinder block wall boundary line and the boundary line set forth in the respective deeds to the adjoining properties—which is a small triangular strip of land measuring approximately 4.2 feet at its widest point—was owned by the Czenszak.

The Iasellos asserted a counterclaim for a judgment declaring that the boundary line between the adjoining properties was as described in the respective deeds and that they owned the disputed strip. They moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and on their counterclaim.  Supreme Court searched the record and, under the doctrine of practical location, awarded summary judgment to Czenszak, declaring that he owned the disputed property. The Iasellos appealed.

Continue reading

NYPD Stops Car With Tinted Windows, Arrest /Search Passenger and Seize Drugs

Court Determines If Officer Had Probable Cause of Vehicle & Traffic Law Violation

NYPD Detective Gregory Fortunato and his partner observed a car with “excessively tinted windows” traveling on a public road. Detective Fortunato pulled the car over and, upon approaching, observed marijuana in plain view.  The officers arrested and searched the passenger Samuel Nektalov, recovering two bags containing cocaine from him. Nektalov moved to suppress the drugs, arguing that the officers lacked probable cause to stop the vehicle on the basis of a traffic violation.

At the suppression hearing in the Criminal Court, Detective Fortunato testified that he pulled the vehicle over because he observed that it was traveling with “excessively tinted windows,” but failed to elaborate further.  The Court denied Nektalov’s suppression motion, finding that Fortunato properly stopped the vehicle in which Nektalov was a passenger because the car apparently violated the Vehicle and Traffic Law for having excessively tinted windows.

Continue reading

Mansion Failed to Close on $2.2m Old Westbury Contract of Sale

Court Determines Whether Or Not Calvano Keeps $110K  Deposit

In April 2020, 7 Mansion LLC entered into a contract to purchase from Lynn Calvano a parcel of property located in Old Westbury for a purchase price of $2,200,000. With a $110,000 contract deposit. Following various delays and an amendment to the contract, Mansion did not appear at a scheduled closing and, by letter dated December 8, 2020, Calvano cancelled the contract. Thereafter, Mansion commenced an action against Calvano seeking specific performance of the contract. Mansion also filed a notice of pendency against the property. Calvano moved to dismiss the complaint based upon documentary evidence and to cancel the notice of pendency. Supreme Court granted the motion. Mansion appealed.

Continue reading

Yellow Caution Tape Wrapped Around Bikes Handlebars

Was City of Long Beach Liable For Resulting Injury to Cyclist?

Zoe Papetti sued the City of Long Beach to recover damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained when she fell while riding her bicycle after yellow caution tape became wrapped around the bicycle’s handlebars. The City moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied the motion. The City appealed.

Continue reading