Category Archives: Real Estate

Subtenants Admittedly Breached Sublease for 25th Street Coop

Court Determines If Sublandlord Failed to Mitigate Damages

Valerie Kikade owned cooperative unit 7C at 242 East 25th Street. She authorized her daughter, Angeli Kakade, to negotiate a sublease of the unit after a subtenant paying $3,300.00 per month was to move out at the end of March 2020. Angeli attested that, on February 17, 2020, Evan Newman and his wife returned to her the executed sublease that Valerie previously had signed, setting the rent at $3,250.00 per month for the unit. The sublease required that the Newmans pay a security deposit to Valerie and that their failure to take possession of the unit after the sublease commenced would constitute a breach of the sublease. The Newmans neither paid the security deposit nor took possession of the unit. Litigation and cross-motions for summary judgment ensued.

Continue reading

Utility Wires Installed Below Ground On Neighbors Property

Was De Minimus  Damage Claim Legally Cognizable?

Andrea Umlas sued Christopher and Patricia Britton, the owners of an adjacent property, for injunctive relief and to recover damages based upon the alleged installation of utility wires below ground on a portion of her property without her permission. The Brittons moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and to sever their counterclaims alleging that Umlas damaged their property. Supreme denied the motion. And the Brittons appealed.

Continue reading

Croton-On-Hudson Neighbors Battle Over Cultivated Common Boundary Strip

Did Salzberg or Sena Own The Formerly Unusable Forest Like Area?

Charles Andrew Salzberg and Kenneth Sena owned adjacent parcels of real property in Croton-on-Hudson. Salzberg purchased his property in 2011 from Daniel Scalzi, who had previously owned the property jointly with his former wife, Victoria Manes, until she transferred ownership to him in 2004. According to Scalzi, in 1987, he spent $12,000 clearings a portion of land along the common boundary of the properties, which at that time consisted of unusable forest-like area, and erecting a split rail fence on the strip, so as to integrate it into his lawn. Scalzi asserted that, thereafter and for the duration of his ownership of the property, he cultivated and maintained the strip, which also included a portion of a barbeque pit that had been built onto his property by a predecessor. Scalzi admitted that during the process of clearing the strip and erecting the fence, he realized, upon his discovery of concrete monuments in the ground, that he was over the boundary line of his property and encroaching somewhat onto the neighboring property. However, Scalzi asserted that he never advised the then owners of  Sena’s property or asked their permission to use a portion of their land.

Continue reading

Owner of Two Adjacent Condominium Units Sought To Enclose Shared Hallway

Court Determines if Board of Managers Properly Conditioned Approval

Andy Y. Wong sought to enclose the section of hallway between apartments 12G and 12H without paying the fees required by a “hallway takeover” rule adopted by the Board the Board of Managers of the 45 W. 67th St. Condominium. The Board conditioned approval on the payment of $90,00 up front  and an annual fee based upon the square footage of the contemplated enclosure. Litigation ensued. Wong moved for summary judgment. Upon searching the record, Supreme Court denied the motion and ruled in favor of the Board. Wong appealed.

The bylaws permitted unit owners to enclose the hallway between their units “with the consent of the Residential Condominium Committee (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed).” And authorized unit owners to raze or incorporate certain spaces “which service or enclose only [the unit owner’s] Residential Unit and do not affect access to any other Unit.”

Continue reading

Saadia Sues National Society For Breach of Brooklyn Realty Contract

Court Decides If Claims Were Barred By Stipulated Damages Limitation

In December 2016, National Society of Hebrew Days Schools Inc. entered into a contract for the sale of certain real property located in Brooklyn to Jack Saadia “or an entity to be formed by him.” 1966 Coney Island, LLC was subsequently formed to purchase the property. Jack Saadia is the principal of the LLC. In May 2018, Saadia and Coney Island commenced an action against National Society for specific performance of the contract. That action was settled pursuant to a stipulation of settlement dated July 23, 2019, which altered certain terms of the contract and set a new closing date of October 24, 2019.  But the parties failed to close.

Continue reading

Property Owner Sues Brokerage/Broker For Refund of Commission Paid Under Protest

Court Determines Liability Under Contract That Was Modified by Seller

Jean Julian Delly sued Arvy Realty and Javier Morales for the refund of a $9,000 real estate brokerage commission that he paid to Arvy under protest. At a nonjury trial, it was established that Hector Villatoro was a licensed real estate broker doing business as Arvy Realty. It was undisputed that, after a buyer for Delly’s property whom he had located without the assistance of a real estate broker was unable to secure financing,

Delly contacted Arvy and Morales. Arvy, a licensed real estate salesperson associated with Arvy, emailed documents to Delly, including a proposed brokerage agreement which Morales had presigned on behalf of Arvy. The form proposed agreement was titled “Exclusive Right to Sell Agreement” but was modified, apparently by Delly, to state that it was “non-exclusive.” Under its compensation provisions, the emailed presigned proposed agreement stated that Delly, as “owner,” would pay the listing broker a total commission of 4% of the selling price, and specified how the payment would potentially be divided with a cooperating broker. But Delly wrote into the agreement and initialed the words “total 2% from seller” before signing and returning the agreement to Arvy and Morales.  The agreement also included a provision “that no change, amendment, modification or termination of this AGREEMENT shall be binding on any party unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties.”

Continue reading

Klara and Christos Sued Cindy For Constructive Trust on Bayside Real Estate

Court Determines If Daughter Held Property in Trust For Parents

Klara and Christos Koumantaros sued Cindy, their daughter, to impose a constructive trust on real property located in Bayside.  When the property was purchased title was vested to the Klara and Cindy. Klara and Christos alleged that the parties had an oral agreement whereby Cindy agreed to hold title to the property as a convenience to them and to relinquish her interest to Christos upon his request.

Following a nonjury trial, Supreme Court issued a judgment, which declared that Cindy held title to the property as a constructive trustee for the benefit of the Klara and Christos and that they were the rightful owners of the property. Cindy appealed.

Continue reading

During Relationship Barber Placed Mobile Home on Woodard’s Property

Can Barber Replevin Abode From Woodward After Relationship Ends?

David Barber commenced a conversion and replevin action, seeking to recover a mobile home which he situated on the property of Marcia Crout-Woodard during their long-term personal relationship. Barber also sought the rental income derived from the mobile home and received by Woodard following the end of their relationship.

Woodard counterclaimed for money damages, alleging breach of contract, based on Barber’s alleged conversion of rental income he collected in excess of the purchase price of the mobile home prior to the parties’ break-up. Following a nonjury trial, Supreme Court found that no contractual relationship existed between the parties and dismissed the action in its entirety on the ground that the mobile home constituted a fixture on Woodard’s realty and, as such, Barber had no ownership interest upon which to base causes of action sounding in conversion and replevin. Barber appealed.

Continue reading

Hirsch (Representative of Village 3 Condominium) Removed from Pondside HOA Board

Court Adjudicates Validity of Discharge Under By-Laws of Both Village 3 and HOA

Litigation arose out of a dispute over the membership of the Board of Managers of the Pondside Homeowners Association (HOA). The complaint alleged that Abby Hirsch was removed from her position on the Board of Managers of the HOA by vote of the members of the Board of Managers of Pondside Village 3 Condominium on December 4, 2021. The complaint further alleged that Hirsch, together with other individuals, thereafter held a previously-scheduled special meeting of the HOA Board on December 6, 2021 at which certain actions were taken. The complaint asserted that the December 6, 2021 meeting was not valid and any actions taken then were void due to the absence of quorum, as Hirsch purported to be one of the required four members present despite having been removed from her position as representative of Village 3 two days prior.

The HOA Board sought a temporary restraining order, in essence seeking to prevent Hirsch from attempting to participate in a meeting of the HOA Board scheduled for December 20, 2021. Upon confirmation that the President of the HOA Board had notified its members that no meeting would be held on December 20, 2021, an order to show cause was signed without a TRO.

Continue reading

Zeppetelli Sued Broadway For Personal Injuries Suffered in a Fall

Did Trial Court Properly Reject Expert’s Proffer and Dismiss Case?

Carol Ann Zeppetelli sued 1372 Broadway Associates, LLC to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered when she fell while descending a staircase between floors at her place of employment. She alleged that the accident occurred because the carpet covering the stairs was slippery. At trial, the Supreme Court granted Broadway’s motion to preclude the testimony of Zeppetelli’s expert engineer, Stanley Fein. The court then granted Broadway’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of her direct case and dismissed the complaint. Zeppetelli appealed.

Continue reading